![]() ![]() This goal was never forgotten, even when he was serving under Morgoth.Īnalysts can argue that even though Tolkien portrays him as the primary antagonist, his intentions were not fueled by evil. Unlike his master, Sauron was interested in maintaining order as he had always wanted. This was a dream come true for him, and he was ready to implement his rule. He later became Morgoth’s second in command after taking over the mantle of Gorthaur the Cruel.Īfter the destruction of Morgoth, Sauron assumed his master’s position as the overall ruler and the second Dark Lord. He was skilled in every way, and his ambition propelled him to learn faster. Over time, Sauron’s progress was noticeable as he kept on rising the demonic ranks and out-performing those who had been under Morgoth longer than himself. At this point, his name could no longer identify him as ‘the admirable,’ so he got the new name ‘Sauron,’ which means ‘the abominable.’ He was no longer admirable, and everyone loathed him because of his evil actions. When Sauron joined Morgoth’s camp, he started to serve under him and learn his ways. His ultimate goal was to be the one with the ultimate power. With a sharp ambition, Sauron didn’t care about the path he followed to achieve it. He needed a big army to fight and win against the Elves and the Men in the First Age. From the beginning, Sauron had no desire to destroy people like Morgoth, but he would have wanted to have so much power like him.Įven though Sauron’s intention to clinch this power was good, Morgoth saw it as an opportunity to bring another powerful man into his army. Sauron’s desire for perfection and orderliness became a loophole that Morgoth used to lure him to evil. At this point, Morgoth had already lured others and corrupted them. There could have been other ways to do it, but Sauron didn’t think his method would have harmed the people. The only way for Sauron to achieve this power was to join Morgoth and serve under him. That means everybody would follow his prescribed order and do everything in coordination. If Sauron could get that power, then others would respect him and do as he would tell them. ![]() Sauron’s love for orderliness everywhere led him to desire the power Morgoth had to do whatever he wanted. This would help him in his mission to subvert and destroy the earthly realms. Morgoth’s hatred was against anything good, and his plan was to lure ambitious souls like Sauron and corrupt them to be like him. At that time, Morgoth was the Dark Lord and had the power to do whatever he wanted. However, Sauron turned evil and committed to a new master, Morgoth. Why Did Sauron Turn Evil?Īs mentioned earlier, Sauron was created good and uncorrupted. His desire for order and perfection became his weakness, and Morgoth used it to corrupt him. Unlike Morgoth, who hated anything good and thrived in destroying everything, Sauron only wanted to rule overall. It’s obvious that everyone would have their own definition of perfection, which is far from what Sauron perceived as perfection. This obsession led him to believe that there would be peace and ease of operation if everyone listened to him and followed his commands.Īs part of the team creating Arda, his agitation towards imperfection might have grown bigger and wanted everything to be done in an orderly manner. ![]() His logic was to have everything done per his prescribed order so that there’s no confusion or unnecessary friction. He was a perfectionist and loved coordination. ![]() He committed to this role until his desire outweighed his good nature and pushed him towards evil. His name was Mairon, which means ‘The Admirable.’ The Silmarillion describes him as the Maia of Aule the Smith, whose primary role was to help the Valar create Arda. La obra de Risco tendría ecos en la aportación realizada sobre Navarra por Traggia en 1802 editada en el Diccionario de la Real Academia de la Historia.Sauron was originally good and angelic, as created by Eru. En esa polémica participaron Juan Antonio Fernández y Miguel de Hualde, que no consiguieron el apoyo de la Diputación. Sus contenidos se pueden relacionar con las ideas sobre la historia de Navarra que sostenía Campomanes. would have echoes in the contribution about Navarre made by Traggia in 1802 published in the Dictionary of the Royal Academy of History.La publicación de La Vasconia, volumen XXXII de la colección España Sagrada, de Manuel Risco generó una polémica sobre los orígenes del reino de Navarra. In this controversy took part Juan Antonio Fernández and Miguel de Hualde, who did not get the support of the navarre Diputation. Its contents may be related with ideas about the history of Navarre held by Campomanes. The publication of La Vasconia, Volume XXXII from the España Sagrada collection, by Manuel Risco generated a controversy about the origins of the kingdom of Navarre. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |